John the Armorer on the NYT’s “missile”

18 Jan 2006

Okay, let’s put this baby to rest

If you can bear to read more about this issue, check out the in-depth analysis at Castle Argghhh!. With pictures and everything.

His conclusion: 122mm HE. That had never occured to Murdoc.

UPDATE: I misread. He meant Paki 155mm. Sorry.

No Responses to “John the Armorer on the NYT’s “missile””

  1. ohwilleke Says:

    Actually, his conclusion was that it was a Pakistani 155mm HE round.

  2. Toejam Says:

    Come on ohwilleke, Ya gonna quibble over a measily 33 mm?