I knew that at some point I’d agree 100% with Frank Warner. Although I don’t really buy his claim that Tony Blair has abandoned the moral high ground by not pointing to Saddam’s atrocities as a main justification for regime change, I buy the same argument when pointed at a guy who:
- Voted for the war
- Then opposed the war
- Then opposed the money to fight the war
- Then complained that the troops don’t have enough body armor
- Then said it’s good that Saddam is out of power
- Followed that statement up immediately by claiming we shouldn’t have gone into Iraq
Who, pray tell, could that possibly be?