Early feedback has been positive. What’s time-consuming is getting the fonts to look right. Which I haven’t managed yet. I need to figure out some sort of standard pracitce to follow. A graphic artist I’m not.
And, as I’ve said before, I’m not singling out MSNBC.com to rip on. In fact, they’re the online biggie that I read and I find them to be better than the competition (in both directions). But their headline box is generally shameful.
People, for the most part, have short memories and have a very high demand for instant gratification. Thus we are seeing a great deal of carping about the inconvience of security checks. Especially at airports. The original World Trade Center attack in 1993 was soon forgotten and 8 years later we had #2. I figure most people will be just as shocked in another 4 years when yet another ‘incident’ happens.
June 29th, 2005 at 11:13 pm
Keep doing these. (Assuming they don’t take too much of your time.)
June 29th, 2005 at 11:33 pm
I second that motion. It really does put into perspective the irresponsible reporting that exists in the media.
June 29th, 2005 at 11:36 pm
Early feedback has been positive. What’s time-consuming is getting the fonts to look right. Which I haven’t managed yet. I need to figure out some sort of standard pracitce to follow. A graphic artist I’m not.
June 29th, 2005 at 11:39 pm
And, as I’ve said before, I’m not singling out MSNBC.com to rip on. In fact, they’re the online biggie that I read and I find them to be better than the competition (in both directions). But their headline box is generally shameful.
June 30th, 2005 at 1:38 am
People, for the most part, have short memories and have a very high demand for instant gratification. Thus we are seeing a great deal of carping about the inconvience of security checks. Especially at airports. The original World Trade Center attack in 1993 was soon forgotten and 8 years later we had #2. I figure most people will be just as shocked in another 4 years when yet another ‘incident’ happens.