Is it just me, or is this insane?
Apparently we are purchasing brand-new AK-47 assault rifles to equip the new Iraqi army. Truth be told, the AK-47 is probably a better weapon for the Iraqis than the M16 that our guys use. There are several reasons for that:
1. They are much more robust in desert conditions, especially when they aren’t maintained properly as they surely won’t be
2. They are much cheaper to buy, maintain, and supply with ammuntion
3. The training required to operate an AK-47 is much less demanding
4. Everyone in the fucking country already has a couple
I just don’t understand the reasoning behind buying new weapons when we are confiscating hundreds every single day. There have been several instances where we uncovered huge stockpiles of unused weapons. There have been reports that we are warehousing them so they can be issued to the new army. So what’s up?
A spokesman for the Coalition Joint Task Force, which commands the military occupation in Iraq, was unaware of the request for bids and questioned it.
“That’s surprising,” said Army Capt. Jeff Fitzgibbons, a task force spokesman in Baghdad. “It would seem to me odd that we’re out there looking to buy more weapons for a place where we’ve already captured and set aside so many of them. It would raise a red flag for me, that’s for sure.”
One of the given reasons is that the weapons confiscated in Iraq come from many different manufacturers, and that there are slight differences between them. I’ll buy that to an extent, but why not sort them out? It’s not like there’s a shortage of cheap labor in the region. The reason that the AK-47 has been in use by so many for so long is that it pretty much works all the time. I don’t recall hearing about the Viet Cong struggling to standardize model variants within their organization. I haven’t read about PLO difficulties with different suppliers.
CalPundit has some thoughts, and the comments section has more good stuff including
It’s a wonderful turn of events! We’re actually respecting Iraqi culture and recognizing that they have tradition in using AK-47s!
And before anyone asks, nothing I’ve read anywhere indicates that Halliburton is involved. Some commenters think that Halliburton is going to charge to destroy the weapons, then turn around and sell the same weapons back. Although that may make a good joke, I’d like to see something bordering on actual evidence before anyone get up in arms. Supposedly the guns are going to be purchased from Poland, who was a supporter of the invasion, but I imagine that the money trail is a bit more twisted than that. It will be interesting to see where it leads when someone finally sniffs it out.
This reminds me of Brian and his mother buying rocks for the stoning
Beard and stone seller: Stone, sir?
Mother: “No, they’ve got a lot there, lying around on the ground.”
Beard and stone seller: “Oh, not like these, sir. Look at this! Feel the quality of that, that’s craftmanship, sir.”
Mother: “Hmm…all right, we’ll have two with points and…a big flat one.”
Brian: “Could I have a flat one, mum?”
Brian: “Sorry! Dad!”
Mother: “Ehm…all right, two points, ahm…two flats and a packet of gravel.”
Beard and stone seller: “Packet of gravel. Should be a good one this afternoon.”
Why do I get the feeling that someone is running around in a fake beard buying things secretly? If life imitates Python, we’re all screwed.