<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Requiring ID = Loss of Freedom to Travel?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/5729.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/5729.html</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:42:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/5729.html/comment-page-1#comment-335424</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 02:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdocnet.com/wp_murdoconline/?p=5729#comment-335424</guid>
		<description>The government monitors where you go within your own country and that&#039;s not a police state?&#039; That&#039;s not actually true. I drove from Louisiana to western Florida two weeks ago and the government had no idea. So, no, it&#039;s not a police state. And you are of course welcome to use a &#039;free market&#039; airline and carry guns if you are into that by chartering a plane. I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The government monitors where you go within your own country and that&#8217;s not a police state?&#8217; That&#8217;s not actually true. I drove from Louisiana to western Florida two weeks ago and the government had no idea. So, no, it&#8217;s not a police state. And you are of course welcome to use a &#8216;free market&#8217; airline and carry guns if you are into that by chartering a plane. I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dfens</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/5729.html/comment-page-1#comment-335381</link>
		<dc:creator>Dfens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdocnet.com/wp_murdoconline/?p=5729#comment-335381</guid>
		<description>Like I say, we will never know what the free market solution would be, because, yet again, we will adopt a government imposed solution that works poorly if at all. What kind of people adopt &#039;free market&#039; policies towards communist China and won&#039;t let the free market work at home? Oh yeah, that would be us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like I say, we will never know what the free market solution would be, because, yet again, we will adopt a government imposed solution that works poorly if at all. What kind of people adopt &#8216;free market&#8217; policies towards communist China and won&#8217;t let the free market work at home? Oh yeah, that would be us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murdoc</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/5729.html/comment-page-1#comment-335372</link>
		<dc:creator>Murdoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdocnet.com/wp_murdoconline/?p=5729#comment-335372</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t fly on a no-holds-barred airline, and I&#039;m a pretty solid NRA kind of guy. I&#039;m not sure where I would come down on a &#039;who should pay for checking IDs to fly&#039; debate, but I know damn well that I would agree that someone should pay for it because it&#039;s necessary. Checking IDs doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s a police state. FWIW, I&#039;d like to see more limitations on how that ID check data is kept and referenced. I&#039;m rather uninformed about details of the current system, but I feel confident that it&#039;s messy, unreliable, and easy to abuse. That doesn&#039;t mean that the system should be trashed. It means it should be improved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t fly on a no-holds-barred airline, and I&#8217;m a pretty solid NRA kind of guy. I&#8217;m not sure where I would come down on a &#8216;who should pay for checking IDs to fly&#8217; debate, but I know damn well that I would agree that someone should pay for it because it&#8217;s necessary. Checking IDs doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s a police state. FWIW, I&#8217;d like to see more limitations on how that ID check data is kept and referenced. I&#8217;m rather uninformed about details of the current system, but I feel confident that it&#8217;s messy, unreliable, and easy to abuse. That doesn&#8217;t mean that the system should be trashed. It means it should be improved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dfens</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/5729.html/comment-page-1#comment-335367</link>
		<dc:creator>Dfens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdocnet.com/wp_murdoconline/?p=5729#comment-335367</guid>
		<description>The government monitors where you go within your own country and that&#039;s not a police state? If people are so hot for all this &#039;airport security&#039;, then let them pay for it out of their ticket price and let it be administered by the airlines or a company of their choosing. If people don&#039;t want it, then let them fly NRA Air, guns allowed, defend your own damn self. They can&#039;t allow that, though, because most people would choose the latter. Yeah, we&#039;re all about &#039;free market&#039; in this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The government monitors where you go within your own country and that&#8217;s not a police state? If people are so hot for all this &#8216;airport security&#8217;, then let them pay for it out of their ticket price and let it be administered by the airlines or a company of their choosing. If people don&#8217;t want it, then let them fly NRA Air, guns allowed, defend your own damn self. They can&#8217;t allow that, though, because most people would choose the latter. Yeah, we&#8217;re all about &#8216;free market&#8217; in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

