<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday Linkzookery &#8211; 07 Nov 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/6485.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/6485.html</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:32:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/6485.html/comment-page-1#comment-337899</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 14:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=6485#comment-337899</guid>
		<description>Dave makes fair points about McCain.  But I don&#039;t think Palin compares well with Reagan.  Death Valley Days &gt; Beauty Contests</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave makes fair points about McCain.  But I don&#8217;t think Palin compares well with Reagan.  Death Valley Days &gt; Beauty Contests</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P.M.Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/6485.html/comment-page-1#comment-337898</link>
		<dc:creator>P.M.Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 11:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=6485#comment-337898</guid>
		<description>Sigh.

Murdoc, that entire area is not controllable except in a very limited way by a combination of carrot and stick, as the British discovered, which is why we combined punitive expeditions (to give hostiles a choice of continuing raiding or rebuilding before winter) and subventions, hopefully going more to my enemy&#039;s enemy than my enemy - which was which was always a moveable feast. The Durand Line was drawn where it was to help split up the groups, deliberately.

The Pakistani government - this or any - has no other cards in its hand. Blaming Pakistanis in general, let alone the government, IS blaming the victim. There is no &quot;harbouring&quot;, the people concerned were there all along and nobody ever managed to winkle them out - there&#039;s been no lack of will.

As for &quot;equivalency stupidity&quot;, you made that up. There are bad guys in the hills doing one sort of bad stuff - and US forces are doing a different sort. Their rights go as far as things like hot pursuit, but this isn&#039;t that. This is the same as though US forces had invaded and/or supported invading Iraq through Turkey even though the Turks had said no. Morally, diplomatically, strategically and tactically, &quot;it was worse than a crime, it was a mistake&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh.</p>
<p>Murdoc, that entire area is not controllable except in a very limited way by a combination of carrot and stick, as the British discovered, which is why we combined punitive expeditions (to give hostiles a choice of continuing raiding or rebuilding before winter) and subventions, hopefully going more to my enemy&#8217;s enemy than my enemy &#8211; which was which was always a moveable feast. The Durand Line was drawn where it was to help split up the groups, deliberately.</p>
<p>The Pakistani government &#8211; this or any &#8211; has no other cards in its hand. Blaming Pakistanis in general, let alone the government, IS blaming the victim. There is no &#8220;harbouring&#8221;, the people concerned were there all along and nobody ever managed to winkle them out &#8211; there&#8217;s been no lack of will.</p>
<p>As for &#8220;equivalency stupidity&#8221;, you made that up. There are bad guys in the hills doing one sort of bad stuff &#8211; and US forces are doing a different sort. Their rights go as far as things like hot pursuit, but this isn&#8217;t that. This is the same as though US forces had invaded and/or supported invading Iraq through Turkey even though the Turks had said no. Morally, diplomatically, strategically and tactically, &#8220;it was worse than a crime, it was a mistake&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveP.</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/6485.html/comment-page-1#comment-337887</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveP.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 23:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=6485#comment-337887</guid>
		<description>Murdoc, my brother, not even Reagan was Reagan. We remember our image of him as a unifier and as a wise man of the conservative movement, but he made a number of avoidable mistakes that we are still paying for today. Palin has what Reagan had: an authentic Americanness, the ability to talk past the media chattering-class to the real Americans out there in flyover country; integrity even when it has a price tag. I hope we see much more of her...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murdoc, my brother, not even Reagan was Reagan. We remember our image of him as a unifier and as a wise man of the conservative movement, but he made a number of avoidable mistakes that we are still paying for today. Palin has what Reagan had: an authentic Americanness, the ability to talk past the media chattering-class to the real Americans out there in flyover country; integrity even when it has a price tag. I hope we see much more of her&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murdoc</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/6485.html/comment-page-1#comment-337883</link>
		<dc:creator>Murdoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=6485#comment-337883</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;P.M. Lawrence&lt;/b&gt;: Equivalency stupidity aside, the Pakis are not only not doing anything about the bad guys, they&#039;re encouraging them.

If you harbor, help, assist, feed, clothe, fund, and sleep with the terrorists, you&#039;re eventually going to get bombed.

That&#039;s the cue to whine about how unfair things are. And, obviously, some people will buy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>P.M. Lawrence</b>: Equivalency stupidity aside, the Pakis are not only not doing anything about the bad guys, they&#8217;re encouraging them.</p>
<p>If you harbor, help, assist, feed, clothe, fund, and sleep with the terrorists, you&#8217;re eventually going to get bombed.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the cue to whine about how unfair things are. And, obviously, some people will buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murdoc</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/6485.html/comment-page-1#comment-337882</link>
		<dc:creator>Murdoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=6485#comment-337882</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;DaveP&lt;/b&gt;: Palin might be the Next Reagan. Honestly, I doubt it. But it&#039;s entirely possible.

One thing&#039;s for sure: She obviously scares Democrats and the media totally shitless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>DaveP</b>: Palin might be the Next Reagan. Honestly, I doubt it. But it&#8217;s entirely possible.</p>
<p>One thing&#8217;s for sure: She obviously scares Democrats and the media totally shitless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveP.</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/6485.html/comment-page-1#comment-337881</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveP.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 13:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=6485#comment-337881</guid>
		<description>Sam, in case you weren&#039;t paying attention:

REAGAN: ended fairness doctrine, allowing free speech on the airwaves for the forst time since the FCC was created.

MCCAIN: McCain-Feingold, which is the worst assault on the First Amendment ever seen. (&quot;Political speech isn&#039;t covered by the First Amendment, and may be regulated...&quot;)

List goes on ad nauseum. McCain was Reagan 2.0 like a Trabant was a Improved Porsche.


Murdoc, you&#039;ve already seen the Next Reagan. She wears a skirt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam, in case you weren&#8217;t paying attention:</p>
<p>REAGAN: ended fairness doctrine, allowing free speech on the airwaves for the forst time since the FCC was created.</p>
<p>MCCAIN: McCain-Feingold, which is the worst assault on the First Amendment ever seen. (&#8221;Political speech isn&#8217;t covered by the First Amendment, and may be regulated&#8230;&#8221;)</p>
<p>List goes on ad nauseum. McCain was Reagan 2.0 like a Trabant was a Improved Porsche.</p>
<p>Murdoc, you&#8217;ve already seen the Next Reagan. She wears a skirt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P.M.Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/6485.html/comment-page-1#comment-337877</link>
		<dc:creator>P.M.Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 07:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=6485#comment-337877</guid>
		<description>&quot;If Pakistan doesn’t like US airstrikes in its territory, it should do something about the bad guys in its territory&quot;.

It can&#039;t do anything about either lot of bad guys. Isn&#039;t this blaming the victim?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If Pakistan doesn’t like US airstrikes in its territory, it should do something about the bad guys in its territory&#8221;.</p>
<p>It can&#8217;t do anything about either lot of bad guys. Isn&#8217;t this blaming the victim?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bram</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/6485.html/comment-page-1#comment-337876</link>
		<dc:creator>Bram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 04:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=6485#comment-337876</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m hoping Bobby Jindal is the next great Conservative leader - we&#039;ll see.  We need to slay some Rinos first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m hoping Bobby Jindal is the next great Conservative leader &#8211; we&#8217;ll see.  We need to slay some Rinos first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/6485.html/comment-page-1#comment-337874</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 03:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=6485#comment-337874</guid>
		<description>McCain WAS that Reagan v2.0!  

If the republican party hadn&#039;t gone stupid in da head these past eight years, I would have voted for im.

Now I am worried the vast Democrat Party will go stupid in the head for the next 8 years now that they are largely in control.

Complete unchecked Power has a way of making good people stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain WAS that Reagan v2.0!  </p>
<p>If the republican party hadn&#8217;t gone stupid in da head these past eight years, I would have voted for im.</p>
<p>Now I am worried the vast Democrat Party will go stupid in the head for the next 8 years now that they are largely in control.</p>
<p>Complete unchecked Power has a way of making good people stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murdoc</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/6485.html/comment-page-1#comment-337873</link>
		<dc:creator>Murdoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 01:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=6485#comment-337873</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Kevin&lt;/b&gt;: You are mistaken about Reagan.

You are not mistaken that we could easily be sitting on a great conservative right now and not know it. In fact, I&#039;m SURE you are right? Why am I so sure?

Because I have no doubt that there are at least a few great conservatives around. I also have no doubt that we don&#039;t know it.

We had better find them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Kevin</b>: You are mistaken about Reagan.</p>
<p>You are not mistaken that we could easily be sitting on a great conservative right now and not know it. In fact, I&#8217;m SURE you are right? Why am I so sure?</p>
<p>Because I have no doubt that there are at least a few great conservatives around. I also have no doubt that we don&#8217;t know it.</p>
<p>We had better find them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
