<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Civil War Saturday: Bayonets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/6712.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/6712.html</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:24:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kristopher</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/6712.html/comment-page-1#comment-339790</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=6712#comment-339790</guid>
		<description>Civil war era bayonet training was still hit or miss.

Units got bayonet training only if their commanders thought it was important. Nationalized state militia units often had none at all. Newly formed Black units usually got fully trained, since it was in the drill manual.

Yes there were exceptions, but this was still usually the case. There were exceptions to the thin as a rail Johnny-Rebb rule too ( and these always get trotted out when an overweight re-enactor wants to do a confederate impression ... heh ), but the stereotype was still valid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Civil war era bayonet training was still hit or miss.</p>
<p>Units got bayonet training only if their commanders thought it was important. Nationalized state militia units often had none at all. Newly formed Black units usually got fully trained, since it was in the drill manual.</p>
<p>Yes there were exceptions, but this was still usually the case. There were exceptions to the thin as a rail Johnny-Rebb rule too ( and these always get trotted out when an overweight re-enactor wants to do a confederate impression &#8230; heh ), but the stereotype was still valid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bram</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/6712.html/comment-page-1#comment-339759</link>
		<dc:creator>Bram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=6712#comment-339759</guid>
		<description>Marines still spend a lot of time training with the bayonet.  Even our current diminutive bayonets can make a horrendous wound when the 5 Killing Blows are properly applied.  I can imagine infantry Marines deciding to clear houses with the blade – I can also imagine them succeeding and freaking out the insurgents in the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marines still spend a lot of time training with the bayonet.  Even our current diminutive bayonets can make a horrendous wound when the 5 Killing Blows are properly applied.  I can imagine infantry Marines deciding to clear houses with the blade – I can also imagine them succeeding and freaking out the insurgents in the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phelps</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/6712.html/comment-page-1#comment-339682</link>
		<dc:creator>Phelps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=6712#comment-339682</guid>
		<description>I was going to make the same point General Patton already made more succinctly.  I would add that the men fixing them are encouraged and motivated by the action, and there is no mistake in your intentions when it is affixed.

Didn&#039;t I read somewhere that in the early days of OIF than the Marines had to issue a quiet reminder that bayonet charges are not part of the house clearing doctrine after they briefly came into fashion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to make the same point General Patton already made more succinctly.  I would add that the men fixing them are encouraged and motivated by the action, and there is no mistake in your intentions when it is affixed.</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t I read somewhere that in the early days of OIF than the Marines had to issue a quiet reminder that bayonet charges are not part of the house clearing doctrine after they briefly came into fashion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.M. Heinrichs</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/6712.html/comment-page-1#comment-339615</link>
		<dc:creator>J.M. Heinrichs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 05:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=6712#comment-339615</guid>
		<description>&quot;... as British troops swarmed the mountaintop and drove the Argentines out, at times fighting with fixed bayonets. Major Kiszely, ... , was the first man into the enemy position, personally shooting two enemy conscripts and bayoneting a third, his bayonet breaking in two.&quot;  (14 Jun 82)

Also: &quot;He said: &quot;I decided the best way to attack was a full-frontal assault. It was my decision to fix bayonets.&quot;&quot;  http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1299447/posts

Bayonets are still quite useful.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; as British troops swarmed the mountaintop and drove the Argentines out, at times fighting with fixed bayonets. Major Kiszely, &#8230; , was the first man into the enemy position, personally shooting two enemy conscripts and bayoneting a third, his bayonet breaking in two.&#8221;  (14 Jun 82)</p>
<p>Also: &#8220;He said: &#8220;I decided the best way to attack was a full-frontal assault. It was my decision to fix bayonets.&#8221;"  <a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1299447/posts" rel="nofollow">http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1299447/posts</a></p>
<p>Bayonets are still quite useful.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grey</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/6712.html/comment-page-1#comment-339614</link>
		<dc:creator>Grey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 05:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=6712#comment-339614</guid>
		<description>&quot;Few men are killed by the bayonet, many are scared by it. Bayonets should be fixed when the fire fight starts&quot;
- General George Patton Jr, &quot;War as I knew it&quot; 1947

I can see them getting some nasty use in the era of muzzle loaders.  Spears had been amung the king of weapons for a long time until firearms came along, so it just seems a natural evolution.

Nowadays, it would seem like Bayonets are merely something thats just meant to frighten until you really need one, in which case you &quot;really&quot; need one.  Being ex AF though, I&#039;ll leave that one as merely conjecture. Hah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Few men are killed by the bayonet, many are scared by it. Bayonets should be fixed when the fire fight starts&#8221;<br />
- General George Patton Jr, &#8220;War as I knew it&#8221; 1947</p>
<p>I can see them getting some nasty use in the era of muzzle loaders.  Spears had been amung the king of weapons for a long time until firearms came along, so it just seems a natural evolution.</p>
<p>Nowadays, it would seem like Bayonets are merely something thats just meant to frighten until you really need one, in which case you &#8220;really&#8221; need one.  Being ex AF though, I&#8217;ll leave that one as merely conjecture. Hah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firehand</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/6712.html/comment-page-1#comment-339592</link>
		<dc:creator>Firehand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=6712#comment-339592</guid>
		<description>I read somewhere, years ago, an account by a doctor from either the Brit or American army(I DID say it was years ago) saying that he rarely saw a bayonet wound; that when it came to bayonet-point the unit that either had less discipline or who&#039;d been worse injured in the volleys would retreat or break and run(depending on remaining discipline).  Those who didn&#039;t... well, you made the point about only treating wounded who were alive and might remain so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read somewhere, years ago, an account by a doctor from either the Brit or American army(I DID say it was years ago) saying that he rarely saw a bayonet wound; that when it came to bayonet-point the unit that either had less discipline or who&#8217;d been worse injured in the volleys would retreat or break and run(depending on remaining discipline).  Those who didn&#8217;t&#8230; well, you made the point about only treating wounded who were alive and might remain so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GunPundit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bayonets</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/6712.html/comment-page-1#comment-339560</link>
		<dc:creator>GunPundit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bayonets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 17:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=6712#comment-339560</guid>
		<description>[...] week&#8217;s entry, the third, is about Bayonets. Go check it out and add to the discussion in the comments section if [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week&#8217;s entry, the third, is about Bayonets. Go check it out and add to the discussion in the comments section if [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
