<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Old-School Gaming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/7499.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/7499.html</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:42:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murdoc</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/7499.html/comment-page-1#comment-342015</link>
		<dc:creator>Murdoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=7499#comment-342015</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Dave&lt;/b&gt;: I&#039;ve been into &quot;wizards and such&quot; a bit more lately, but I admit that my &quot;old-school gaming&quot; bug extends beyond fantasy RPGs. In fact, my son and I have been playing a little PanzerBlitz recently.

Of all, things, I&#039;ve never played ASL. I&#039;ve always sort of wanted to, and used to look the box over in the hobby store.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Dave</b>: I&#8217;ve been into &#8220;wizards and such&#8221; a bit more lately, but I admit that my &#8220;old-school gaming&#8221; bug extends beyond fantasy RPGs. In fact, my son and I have been playing a little PanzerBlitz recently.</p>
<p>Of all, things, I&#8217;ve never played ASL. I&#8217;ve always sort of wanted to, and used to look the box over in the hobby store.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/7499.html/comment-page-1#comment-342014</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=7499#comment-342014</guid>
		<description>It may not be your cup of tea if you are looking for wizards and such, but Advanced Squad Leader, the old Avalon Hill WWII tactical level game (now Habro-MMP) is alive and well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may not be your cup of tea if you are looking for wizards and such, but Advanced Squad Leader, the old Avalon Hill WWII tactical level game (now Habro-MMP) is alive and well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mulliga</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/7499.html/comment-page-1#comment-342012</link>
		<dc:creator>Mulliga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=7499#comment-342012</guid>
		<description>My gaming group started looking at some of these retro-clones when 4E D&amp;D came out (a lot of people in our group didn&#039;t want to make the switch from 3.5, and some even wanted to go back to AD&amp;Dfor old times sake). I&#039;m pretty familiar with &quot;old&quot; D&amp;D and its quirks (you get more XP for having high ability scores, dwarves and elves are separate classes, etc.), and it is a throwback to a simpler time.

You do sacrifice many years of combat balancing. For me, fights in old versions of D&amp;D (Basic and its progeny) are tedious and boring (though they happen much faster without individual initiative sequencing). There are parts of old D&amp;D that are more flavorful than new age D&amp;D (I still kinda miss the thief tables instead of a one-size-fits-all Thievery skill check, for instance), but overall, we decided to stick with the relatively new stuff (4E and Pathfinder).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My gaming group started looking at some of these retro-clones when 4E D&amp;D came out (a lot of people in our group didn&#8217;t want to make the switch from 3.5, and some even wanted to go back to AD&amp;Dfor old times sake). I&#8217;m pretty familiar with &#8220;old&#8221; D&amp;D and its quirks (you get more XP for having high ability scores, dwarves and elves are separate classes, etc.), and it is a throwback to a simpler time.</p>
<p>You do sacrifice many years of combat balancing. For me, fights in old versions of D&amp;D (Basic and its progeny) are tedious and boring (though they happen much faster without individual initiative sequencing). There are parts of old D&amp;D that are more flavorful than new age D&amp;D (I still kinda miss the thief tables instead of a one-size-fits-all Thievery skill check, for instance), but overall, we decided to stick with the relatively new stuff (4E and Pathfinder).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

