<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pic of USS Bainbridge (DDG 96)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/7590.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/7590.html</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:24:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AW1 Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/7590.html/comment-page-1#comment-342237</link>
		<dc:creator>AW1 Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 23:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=7590#comment-342237</guid>
		<description>USS Bainbridge (DDG 96),

   Because Bath built is BEST built!  :)

http://www.gdbiw.com/

http://www.navytimes.com/xml/news/2007/07/navy_zumwalt_shipyard_070722w/nt_bathiron_800_070720.JPG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>USS Bainbridge (DDG 96),</p>
<p>   Because Bath built is BEST built!  :)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gdbiw.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.gdbiw.com/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.navytimes.com/xml/news/2007/07/navy_zumwalt_shipyard_070722w/nt_bathiron_800_070720.JPG" rel="nofollow">http://www.navytimes.com/xml/news/2007/07/navy_zumwalt_shipyard_070722w/nt_bathiron_800_070720.JPG</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Old Fart</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/7590.html/comment-page-1#comment-342221</link>
		<dc:creator>The Old Fart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=7590#comment-342221</guid>
		<description>Obama would rather talk. We need Uncle Tommy back to send in the SEALS and when the Alabama docks, with it&#039;s yard arms out,(I probable have that wrong as I was not in the Navy), and the pirates just a swinging in the breeze.

Called UNC coach and not the Captain&#039;s family......DISGRACEFUL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama would rather talk. We need Uncle Tommy back to send in the SEALS and when the Alabama docks, with it&#8217;s yard arms out,(I probable have that wrong as I was not in the Navy), and the pirates just a swinging in the breeze.</p>
<p>Called UNC coach and not the Captain&#8217;s family&#8230;&#8230;DISGRACEFUL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toejam</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/7590.html/comment-page-1#comment-342220</link>
		<dc:creator>Toejam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=7590#comment-342220</guid>
		<description>Obama Calls UNC Coach from Air Force One to Congratulate Him on NCAA Championship
 
Does he call family of the Captain being hijacked from his US Flagged ship??.......NO !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama Calls UNC Coach from Air Force One to Congratulate Him on NCAA Championship</p>
<p>Does he call family of the Captain being hijacked from his US Flagged ship??&#8230;&#8230;.NO !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/7590.html/comment-page-1#comment-342218</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=7590#comment-342218</guid>
		<description>Murdoc, it just gets better. The Bainbridge is being backed up by the USS Halyburton... 

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murdoc, it just gets better. The Bainbridge is being backed up by the USS Halyburton&#8230; </p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/7590.html/comment-page-1#comment-342213</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 23:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=7590#comment-342213</guid>
		<description>Hey, Murdoc, want a cheap post? Talk about the man the various USS Bainbridges have been named after -- especially the conflicts he served in. 

The irony is especially ironic.

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Murdoc, want a cheap post? Talk about the man the various USS Bainbridges have been named after &#8212; especially the conflicts he served in. </p>
<p>The irony is especially ironic.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murdoc</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/7590.html/comment-page-1#comment-342212</link>
		<dc:creator>Murdoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=7590#comment-342212</guid>
		<description>The C-RAM uses a CIWS Block 1B. Not sure how the sensors and targeting compares to what&#039;s on a DDG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The C-RAM uses a CIWS Block 1B. Not sure how the sensors and targeting compares to what&#8217;s on a DDG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/7590.html/comment-page-1#comment-342211</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=7590#comment-342211</guid>
		<description>They should stick 3 or 4 c-ram&#039;s on each of these.  R2-D2 is good, C-ram is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should stick 3 or 4 c-ram&#8217;s on each of these.  R2-D2 is good, C-ram is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murdoc</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/7590.html/comment-page-1#comment-342209</link>
		<dc:creator>Murdoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=7590#comment-342209</guid>
		<description>I found this article:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.navytimes.com/news/2008/09/navy_ciws_091508w/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Analyst: DDGs without CIWS vulnerable&lt;/a&gt;.

The plan was all along to add one Block 1B CIWS to the ships built without, but only some (at most) have received it yet. It will be aft. Here&#039;s a good pic of USS Gridley (DDG 101) with R2D2 visible above the helicopter hangar:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/73/USS-Gridley---enters_San_Diego_bay.jpg

I&#039;d still be concerned that there&#039;s a lot of territory that gun can&#039;t cover alone. The Block 1B has been upgraded to take on boats and helicopters as well as missiles and aircraft.

Block 1B info:
http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/003558.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this article:<br />
<a href="http://www.navytimes.com/news/2008/09/navy_ciws_091508w/" rel="nofollow">Analyst: DDGs without CIWS vulnerable</a>.</p>
<p>The plan was all along to add one Block 1B CIWS to the ships built without, but only some (at most) have received it yet. It will be aft. Here&#8217;s a good pic of USS Gridley (DDG 101) with R2D2 visible above the helicopter hangar:<br />
<a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/73/USS-Gridley---enters_San_Diego_bay.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/73/USS-Gridley&#8212;enters_San_Diego_bay.jpg</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;d still be concerned that there&#8217;s a lot of territory that gun can&#8217;t cover alone. The Block 1B has been upgraded to take on boats and helicopters as well as missiles and aircraft.</p>
<p>Block 1B info:<br />
<a href="http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/003558.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/003558.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murdoc</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/7590.html/comment-page-1#comment-342208</link>
		<dc:creator>Murdoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=7590#comment-342208</guid>
		<description>DDG 85 and up were built without CIWS. Never made sense to me regardless of whatever else they&#039;ve got on the ship.

I&#039;ve heard that some of these ships have since been seen with a CIWS added aft, though. I&#039;ve never looked into that, but if anyone has the info pass it on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DDG 85 and up were built without CIWS. Never made sense to me regardless of whatever else they&#8217;ve got on the ship.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard that some of these ships have since been seen with a CIWS added aft, though. I&#8217;ve never looked into that, but if anyone has the info pass it on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SwissFreek</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/7590.html/comment-page-1#comment-342207</link>
		<dc:creator>SwissFreek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=7590#comment-342207</guid>
		<description>Weird, I don&#039;t see R2D2 anywhere on the ship. Shouldn&#039;t there be one ahead of the forecastle just below the (I assume) fire director antenna?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird, I don&#8217;t see R2D2 anywhere on the ship. Shouldn&#8217;t there be one ahead of the forecastle just below the (I assume) fire director antenna?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
