<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Helicopters Only for 2nd British Carrier?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/8789.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/8789.html</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:42:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murdoc Online &#187; Both Brit Carriers to Take F-35</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/8789.html/comment-page-1#comment-344033</link>
		<dc:creator>Murdoc Online &#187; Both Brit Carriers to Take F-35</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=8789#comment-344033</guid>
		<description>[...] Last week I pointed out a story which claimed that the Prince of Wales, the second of two new British aircraft carriers, could be switched to a helicopter-only commando carrier. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last week I pointed out a story which claimed that the Prince of Wales, the second of two new British aircraft carriers, could be switched to a helicopter-only commando carrier. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murdoc Online &#187; 50% Fewer Joint Strike Fighters?</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/8789.html/comment-page-1#comment-343984</link>
		<dc:creator>Murdoc Online &#187; 50% Fewer Joint Strike Fighters?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=8789#comment-343984</guid>
		<description>[...] As noted last week, Great Britain is considering cutting its buy to around 50 and turn its second Queen Elizabeth-class .... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As noted last week, Great Britain is considering cutting its buy to around 50 and turn its second Queen Elizabeth-class &#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/8789.html/comment-page-1#comment-343903</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=8789#comment-343903</guid>
		<description>Well given that the F-35 program just got another 17 billion price jump - they might not be even able to field the one new carrier... Why don&#039;t they just buy some of our old LHA&#039;s. 2 Carriers are pretty worthless anyway, you need 3 to keep one at sea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well given that the F-35 program just got another 17 billion price jump &#8211; they might not be even able to field the one new carrier&#8230; Why don&#8217;t they just buy some of our old LHA&#8217;s. 2 Carriers are pretty worthless anyway, you need 3 to keep one at sea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murdoc</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/8789.html/comment-page-1#comment-343902</link>
		<dc:creator>Murdoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=8789#comment-343902</guid>
		<description>The article was pretty short on details, but it mentioned saving &#163;600 million on the ship itself in addition to the money saved by not buying the planes. I presume this savings means that a lot of equipment needed to operate fixed-wing aircraft would be deleted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article was pretty short on details, but it mentioned saving &pound;600 million on the ship itself in addition to the money saved by not buying the planes. I presume this savings means that a lot of equipment needed to operate fixed-wing aircraft would be deleted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Burleson</title>
		<link>http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/8789.html/comment-page-1#comment-343901</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Burleson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murdoconline.net/?p=8789#comment-343901</guid>
		<description>They&#039;ll probably swap planes between the 2 ships anyway.

But even so, if one is a helicopter carrier, where will the choppers come from, since they can&#039;t even afford them for the Army in Afghanistan?

Can&#039;t afford planes or choppers. The world&#039;s biggest most expensive ferry boats!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ll probably swap planes between the 2 ships anyway.</p>
<p>But even so, if one is a helicopter carrier, where will the choppers come from, since they can&#8217;t even afford them for the Army in Afghanistan?</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t afford planes or choppers. The world&#8217;s biggest most expensive ferry boats!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

