The New York times didn’t want to publish any of the scandalous “Climategate” emails because they “were never intended for the public eye” but has no problems writing about a “black jail” at Bagram.

It’s almost like they’re selective about their willingness to publish controversial items.

4 Responses to “So Much for not publishing stuff ‘never intended for the public eye’”

  • Matthew Jacobs:

    Gee!.. I wonder why?

  • Hawk:

    LOL at “black jail at Bagram”.

    The prisoners there lived better than I did in the compound next door. And don’t get me started on the new prison …

  • Media Bias? What Media Bias?

    I sure don’t see any Media Bias going on here — nope, and no ulterior motives either!

    Yep, nothing but fair, accurate, and ETHICAL journalism…

  • ER:

    Isn’t most media entertainment?
    Then, when does journalism become entertainment?
    wait, I guess media can be entertainment, anyway ill go away now…