Contractors tied to effort to track, kill militants

Intelligence-gathering operation used for lethal action, officials say

In the New York Times:

Under the cover of a benign government information-gathering program, a Defense Department official set up a network of private contractors in Afghanistan and Pakistan to help track and kill suspected militants, according to military officials and businessmen in Afghanistan and the United States.

The official, Michael D. Furlong, hired contractors from private security companies that employed former C.I.A. and Special Forces operatives. The contractors, in turn, gathered intelligence on the whereabouts of suspected militants and the location of insurgent camps, and the information was then sent to military units and intelligence officials for possible lethal action in Afghanistan and Pakistan, the officials said.

The story mentions that “It is generally considered illegal for the military to hire contractors to act as spies.”

Well, you don’t “consider” whether it’s illegal or not. It is, or it isn’t. If this was illegal, it should have been run by the CIA, which is where we want the law-breaking terrorist killers to be working.

“While no legitimate intelligence operations got screwed up, it’s generally a bad idea to have freelancers running around a war zone pretending to be James Bond,” one American government official said.

Well, these were apparently people hired by a DoD official, not “freelancers running around pretending to be James Bond.”

There is at least some speculation that the work brought some results.

Then there’s this:

Moreover, in Pakistan, where Qaeda and Taliban leaders are believed to be hiding, the secret use of private contractors may be seen as an attempt to get around the Pakistani government’s prohibition of American military personnel’s operating in the country.

Honestly, I’m not sure that I really see this concern as much of a concern.


  1. What you should be concerned about is the establishment of a precedent; we are now in the habit out outsourcing FIGHTING, as well as nearly every other aspect of warfare.

    Recall that the Roman Empire did this, largely the same way we are, and for the same reasons — and it triggered of their destruction of their nation, once rival powers who did their own fighting became aware of Rome’s practice.

  2. What annoys me about contractors, is when they are employed to torture people. The average soldier gets in trouble, as the brass applies containment and looks for scape goats.

    On the other hand its a ‘war on terror’ yet the terrorists seem to be let out early, before the war is over.

  3. Of course we have to use contractors. Obama and Holder chased all the actual ops talent out of the CIA. Who would want to run an op as part of the CIA these days when you may be prosecuted for hurting a terrorist?

    Contractors probably get paid very nicely and stash it somewhere far from the grasping claws of the IRS.

Comments are closed