Archive for July, 2004
Expat Yank notes this about Teresa Heinz-Kerry’s outburst and Hillary Rodam Clinton’s enthusiastic approval:
This may work for Kerry. No one really likes reporters. Heinz-Kerry blurting out what we all would LOVE to say sometimes is not likely to do the “J.F.K.” campaign too much harm.
I think he’s right, since we all are sick and tired of reporters asking dumb questions. But the problem here is that many Americans will say “You go, girl” to the woman giving it to the reporter when she was clearly in the wrong. She said what the reporter said she said, and she hotly denied it out of hand. Never mind that she had just finished a speech calling for more civil political discourse. Never mind that the former First Lady, who is currently a Senator and potentially a US presidential candidate, is sticking up for her.
[Senior Kerry adviser Tad] Devine said Heinz Kerry has been a great campaigner for her husband. “She’s someone who connects with voters, who cares deeply about issues. And the fact that she speaks what’s on her mind, I think it’s enormously refreshing. It’s something the American people want to hear more of.”
Kerry’s senior advisor thinks the American people want to hear more hypocrisy? More rude and dismissive answers to questions that beg answers? More flat denials in the face of obvious truth?
While I don’t think Americans truly want to hear more of that, I’m certain that’s what we’ll be getting more of. From both sides. But let’s watch Mr. Devine. If and when he claims some in the media or in the other campaign are playing unfair, let’s remember that he thinks that’s what Americans want.
They’re Not Asking the Right Questions
James at Hell in a Handbasket notes the story that 7,000 people not allowed to purchase guns did so in 2002 and 2003.
James writes
But why would people prohibited from owning a gun try to buy one in the first place? It’s a crime for them to even try, punishable for up tyo 4 years in a Federal pen.The news story admits that prohibited people (usually criminals, I’d say) tried to acquire guns 122,000 times in the same 2 year period. Even though this is a felony, and the Feds have a record of the crime, they only actually brought charges 154 times.
154 arrests out of 122,000 felonies. No wonder the criminals are trying to buy guns at legal gun shops. They might as well, there’s no penalty of they get caught at it.
In my humble opinion, all 7,000 should be vigorously prosecuted and sentenced. Don’t complain that more gun control is needed when the current gun control isn’t enforced. It’s that same old argument — Those that follow the law will suffer, and those that don’t (not coincidentally those that are the problem) will not suffer. Never mind the availability of black market weapons. If they keep trying at a legal gun shop, they’re bound to get through sooner or later.
By the way, the numbers in the story indicate that the present background check system works 99.958% of the time. And that’s without really enforcing the penalties for wrongdoers.
Go read James’ whole post.
UPDATE: James comments that it shouldn’t be the 7,000 who are “vigorously prosecuted and sentenced”, but all 122,000 who tried to buy, since they are clearly violating the law. He’s right.
PHILIPPINES: No Deals With Communist Kidnappers
On Strategy Page:
July 27, 2004: Soldiers and police continue to search for the long suspected, but never seen, Jemaah Islamiah terrorist training camp that is supposed to be on Mindanao island. Army intelligence believes that there are at least sixty Jemaah Islamiah members involved, most of them from nearby Indonesia. Members if a radical element in the MILF is supposed to be helping out. Some American Special Forces troops are on Mindanao helping with training, and trying to find the rumored terrorist camp.
MILF, in this case, stands for Moro Islamic Liberation Front.
Just read the whole Strategy Page page. Filled with all sorts of info about terrorism in the Philippines. Who would’ve guessed?
Jordanian Firm Withdraws From Iraq
In an effort to gain the release of two kidnapped truck drivers, a Jordanian construction firm has agreed to pull out of Iraq.
Fayez Saad al-Udwan and Mohammad Ahmed Salama al-Manaya’a — who work as drivers for the private company Daoud and Partners — were kidnapped Monday by a group calling itself the Mujahedeen Corps in Iraq. The group warned the pair would be killed within 72 hours unless their employer withdrew from Iraq and stopped cooperating with U.S forces.
The weird part is
Earlier Tuesday, relatives of the hostages had threatened to behead the al-Ouweiss and kill all the company’s staff if the firm did not immediately meet the kidnappers’ demand to withdraw.“We told the firm’s executive director, Rami al-Ouweiss, that if he does not comply with the kidnappers’ demands today, his company and the lives of his employees will not be spared,” said al-Udwan’s brother, Omar.
Al-Manaya’a's father, Ahmed Salama, said: “We will chop off the head of the firm’s director if he doesn’t heed our demands to completely cease his operation in Iraq.” (emphasis mine)
Very honorable. I realize that the family is in a very tight spot, but isn’t that a bit extreme? (via The Command Post)
Thoughts?
I was shocked by the front page at MSNBC this morning:

I was even more shocked by the title of the actual story:
![]()
Was this for real? Had MSNBC.com been hacked by the VRWC? Had a GOP-designed computer virus sent me to FoxNews.com when I opened up MSNBC? Not only was this poll getting coverage, it was getting top billing. And the explanation was simple and to-the-point. Results were compared to previous results. In a Washington Post article, no less.
The survey suggests that the stakes for Kerry and the Democrats as they began their convention in Boston could not be higher. In barely a month, Kerry has lost ground to President Bush on every top voting issue in this year’s election.A growing proportion of voters say Bush and not Kerry is the candidate who most closely shares their values, and four in 10 believe the Democrat is “too liberal.” Bush has even narrowed the gap on which candidate better understands their problems, an area in which Kerry has led.
Is this for real? Simple reporting on a poll and straighforward analysis of the results, with previous results and trends noted?
Alas, it isn’t.
Next paragraph:
The poll suggests that negative ads by the Bush-Cheney campaign that have been airing since early March, as well as attacks by Republican officials, have been increasingly successful in planting the image of Kerry as an unreliable leader who flip-flops on the issues — perceptions that Democrats will work hard to reverse at their convention.
So it’s the mean Republicans who are responsible for voters’ uncertainty. It’s negative political ads that are responsible for the image of Kerry flip-flopping on the issues.
Sigh…
Teresa Heinz Kerry Tells Pittsburgh Reporter To “Shove It”
I’m sure you’ve heard all about it. Teresa Heinz Kerry, shortly after giving a speech urging a return to civility in American politics, told a reporter from a conservative newspaper to “shove it”:
“We need to turn back some of the creeping, un-Pennsylvanian and sometimes un-American traits that are coming into some of our politics,” she told her fellow Pennsylvanians at a Sunday night reception at the Massachusetts Statehouse.Minutes later, Colin McNickle, the editorial page editor of the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, questioned her on exactly what she meant by the term “un-American,” according to a tape of the encounter recorded by WTAE Channel 4 Action News.
Heinz Kerry said “I didn’t say that” several times to McNickle. She then turned to confer with Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell and others. When she faced McNickle again a short time later, he continued to question her, and she replied, “You said something I didn’t say. Now shove it.”
According to the video clip on the site, Hillary Clinton approves.
I think a lot of Americans are going to say, ‘Good for you! You go girl!’ And that certainly is how I feel about it.
Now, if I had said last week that a prominent figure in the Kerry campaign would tell a reporter to “shove it” and that Hillary Clinton would publicly support the move, you would have said I was a Right-Wing loon. I might have been, and I might still be. But I would have been right.
Please explain to me how this is just a bunch of hot air stirred up by Republicans.
UPDATE: The NY Times isn’t even sure that she said “un-American”. That makes them and Teresa.
I have been neglecting the Stryker lately. I will make it up to you shortly.
This pic is from the Multi-National Corps page, formerly Combined Joint Task Force 7. Click the pic for a supersize version. Note the Mk-19 grenade launcher on the weapon mount (as opposed to the .50 cal MG) and the Iraqi forces in a line of pick-up trucks. The one in front is a Nissan, but there appears to be quite a mix of makes. (via Stryer Brigade News, who hasn’t been neglecting the Stryker lately)
Via Michelle Malkin: ![]()
Just remember, this is the same actor who plays a young woman who bears Darth Vader’s children…
Via Instapundit:
Rather than letting people protest near The Fleet Center, they are putting them in a camp….at least, that’s what it looks like. I walked through it this morning. The protester’s cage is about a block away, a maze of overhead netting, chain link fencing and razor wire will be the protesting area. Can you imagine if the RNC did this? It would be the top story on every newscast and in every newspaper….the left would accuse them of suppressing free speech! It would be compared to Nazi Germany!But when the Democrats do it, nary a peep.
I’m not saying that protesters should be “locked up” and I’m not saying they shouldn’t be at this sort of thing. But I am saying that if we hear about it when the Bush administration does it, we should be hearing about it when the DNC does it. Let’s compare the coverage this gets this week compared to the coverage this same issue will get during the GOP convention in September.
UPDATE: Wizbang links to photos of the “Free Speech Zone” taken last week. Must be seen to be believed. What country is this?
Episode III title officially announced: ‘Revenge of the Sith’
Well, I’m assuming that this title is going to be more effective than the previous two.
Most people (non-SW geeks) who have seen Episode I don’t know what the phantom menace was. One guy told me that the “phantom” was the holographic image of Darth Sidious, since he’s menacing and a phantom. Let’s just say that the title wasn’t very clear.
Episode II, of course, had a very clear title, simple and explicit. Except that the clones didn’t ‘attack’. It would have been more accurate to call the movie “Clones to the Rescue” or “Defense of the Clones”. Let’s just say that the title was misleading.
Episode III’s title certainly seems apt. We all know that the Sith all but wipe out the Jedi, and that the Republic becomes an Empire. In Episode I Darth Maul told Sidious “At last we will reveal ourselves to the Jedi. At last we will have revenge.” It seems a safe bet that’s going to happen.
(Unless Lucas made more extravagant changes to the original trilogy than has been indicated. Who knows? When the DVDs come out this September, STAR WARS may have transmogrified into an epic song-and-dance musical saga and Lucas will be there to tell us that’s “what he wanted all along but the technology just wasn’t there in 1977″.)
I’m not blown away by this title. Of course, at this point I’m not likely to be blown away by anything in Episode III. And that’s very disappointing.

